The famous Russian
theoretical physicist Lev Landau evaluated scientists and their research by
their impact according to the "Landau categories". While this is well
known and its description can be found on the internet I was told many years
ago that he came up with a further extension of this idea into a colourful
analogy, and unfortunately I can not find any reference to this, so as far as I
know it may have been an invention of the person who told this to me whose
identity I have long forgotten. In this picture scientists and their works can
be divided into three categories, brick makers, house builders and pathologists.
Brick makers, driven purely by curiosity, create new fundamental concepts, that
form elements of structure, bricks, windows, window frames, door handles etc...
They wander around making these, leaving them in random heaps. The house
builders look through these piles left by the brick makers and figure out how
to build houses from them. The pathologists then take over the houses and live
in them and only contribute to the structure of the houses by occasionally
damaging them. The pathologists take all credit for the building of the houses,
as falsely convincing others of their merit is their skill. With time the power
and influence and prevalence of the pathologists comes to dominate with
thermodynamic inevitability. I was reminded of this reading a book I picked up
in an airport "Talk like TED". I thought it could possible have some
good public speaking tips, as the TED talk style seems to work. While there was
some good advice, it was drowned in a sea of the most extreme, to the point of
self parody, laugh out loud jingoistic nonsense and even obvious
pseudoneuroscience. Ultimately I could see that the book, indirectly, described
exactly what has gone wrong with the TED talk series, and how this has
happened. As originally conceived the TED series (Technology Entertainment
Design) was a great format for people who were real experts in something to
give very entertaining short talks on a general level about the real something
they knew about and these talks were disseminated over the Internet through a
very well designed website. Up until about 2009 this worked well, with several
very interesting talks full of real information by brilliant people. Then the
pathologists started to seep in and take over and it started to decay to the
point where by about 2012 they had become vacuous pseudoscience filled parodies
of themselves delivered by mostly "motivational speakers". The book
breathlessly described the speaking styles and the messages of the very most
vacuous TED talks I remember seeing, and how riveting their, as was clear to
me, non-messages were. It described as success what I saw as the ultimate
failure of the TED talks. When success is measured purely by the extent to
which excitement is triggered in the audience of rich celebrities and other
powerful people who paid thousands of dollars to be in the audience, who have
no knowledge of the subject, victory is assured to the pathologists. Amazing
ignorant people without the constraint of conveying actual factual information
is much easier; those hobbled by sticking to this constraint will be unable to
compete. Sadly the TED talks are but a microcosm of what has occurred across
science in the past 50 years. Originally the merits of the brick makers was
understood and respected and the house builders led the scientific endeavour.
From the 50s until the beginning of the 80s science institutes had many
scientists and many technicians and secretaries to support them and very few
administrators at the top, maybe 2 or 3 for an entire institute, and all they
did was ensured that scientists had access to the resources that they needed.
Then the pathologists started to move in, with strategic planning, tactical
research thrusts, key areas to chase that they did not realize were only
buzzwords and hired more like themselves. Now research institutes have fewer
scientists, virtually no support staff and huge numbers of administrators
involved in "strategic planning" "business incubation"
"collaboration management". The scientific endeavour now revolves
around grant application with staff hired to help write these. The demands of
grant application increase with longer more intricate applications, and, to add
insult to injury, a demand for sections of the grant applications to be focused
around the meaningless buzzwords of the pathologists who now control the
distribution of funding. The policy makers in turn no longer know the
difference between buzzwords and real science and think the buzzwords are the
actual science. Brick makers can not survive beyond the post doctoral fellowship
in the current environment, while a few can be protected for a short time by
some of the remaining house builders the dedication of being able to focus on a
tiny area of research for decades needed to really come up with truly novel
house components becomes impossible. The house builders thus fight a losing
battle with an ever-depleting supply of new house parts as they watch the
pathologists increase in power status and prestige and ultimately gain control
over them. All that can be done is to try to remain a house builder, try to
create a safe space for brick makers, while taking on the outer veneer of a
pathologist creating a pocket of resistance. But is it possible to fight the
pull of the dark side and not wake up one morning to realize that you have
become a pathologist yourself? Are we fighting against inevitable thermodynamic
decay? Chillingly what has happened in science, in turn, represents a microcosm
of our current global society. The rise of populist political parties in
Europe, the Brexit victory, and The rise of Donald Trump represent victory of
the fact free politics of the pathologists. The best hope for science and,
in turn, society (I think we can safely give up on the TED talks) maybe be to
create small pockets of resistance where house builders protecting brick makers
might survive the ultimate total implosion that the pathologists will
inevitably bring about once they gain complete control. So realize the
situation, stay true to reality, and use all your energy to create such pockets
of resistance. Let's see what happens...
No comments:
Post a Comment